The left's ignorant (intentionally?) take on Newt and the Supreme Court

"Newt doesn't think there the Supreme Court is in the Constitution," the far left is saying.

What Newt said is that while there is a "court which is the Supreme of the judicial branch," "it’s not supreme over the legislative and executive branch. We now have this entire national elite that wants us to believe that any five lawyers are a Constitutional convention."

So when Newt said there is no "Supreme Court," it was his way of saying the Supreme Court is not intended to be more powerful than the President or Congress. (In fact, of all the branches, the judicial was meant to be the weakest.)

The only question that remains is this: are the liberals saying this simply ignorant of the facts or are they intentionally misleading -- ahem, lying -- about it?

Video of Newt's interview on Squawk Box

Link.

Gingrich on Greta.

I don't know, but I love that title. Don't you?

Tonight Newt Gingrich will be interviewed -- live from Iowa -- about his possible 2012 run. I would imagine that it will discuss a few of the things he'd do as POTUS, his current state of mind and the progress of his "testing the waters" phase. 

Along with Newt, we should see the likes of Rick Santorum and Tim Pawlenty, who are also thinking about running. 

It's on like Donkey Kong (I'm trying out these new catch phrases, you see), tonight at 10Pm ET.